Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions, and Global Governance
Identifieur interne : 006A41 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 006A40; suivant : 006A42Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions, and Global Governance
Auteurs : Clark A. MillerSource :
- Governance [ 0952-1895 ] ; 2007-04.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- geographic : Iraq.
- topic : Arctique, Biodiversité, Société civile, Changement climatique, Démocratie délibérative, écosystème, Réchauffement climatique, Gouvernance, Politique internationale, Relation internationale, Commerce international, Légitimité, Pouvoir politique, Politique publique, Développement durable.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Accountability, African elephant, Antiglobalization protests, Antonia handler chayes, Arbitrary exercise, Arctic, Arctic climate impact assessment, Arctic peoples, Arctic region, Available evidence, Biodiversity, Biodiversity conservation, Biological diversity, Broad participation, Bush administration, Cambridge university press, Central problem, Chayes, Civil society, Clark miller, Climate change, Climate science, Climate system, Common heritage, Conservation biologists, Credibility, Credibility contests, Critique, Deliberation, Deliberative, Deliberative democracy, Democratic constraints, Democratic critique, Democratic legitimacy, Democratic order, Democratic publics, Democratic reforms, Democratic societies, Domestic contexts, Domestic counterparts, Domestic politics, Domestic settings, Earthly politics, Ecosystem, Environmental governance, Epistemic, Epistemic chaos, Epistemic communities, Epistemic frameworks, Expert authority, Expert knowledge, Factual basis, Focal point, Framework convention, Full analysis, Global, Global affairs, Global biodiversity assessment, Global community, Global deliberation, Global environment, Global environment facility, Global exercise, Global governance, Global kinds, Global level, Global media, Global policies, Global policy, Global policy debates, Global politics, Global publics, Global society, Global systems, Global warming, Globalization, Governance, Greater detail, Greenhouse, Greenhouse gases, Harvard university press, Iaea, Iaea claims, Iaea inspections, Illegitimate exercise, Illicit weapons program, Independent sources, Indigenous communities, Indigenous groups, Indigenous peoples, Intelligence capabilities, International affairs, International assessments, International contexts, International governance, International institutions, International knowledge institutions, International order, International organization, International organizations, International relations, International settings, International system, International trade, Ipcc, Ipcc claims, Iraq, Iraqi, Iraqi possession, Jasanoff, Keohane, Knowledge claims, Knowledge institutions, Knowledge production, Kyoto protocol, Legitimacy, Legitimate exercise, Marginal groups, Martello, Martha finnemore, Marybeth, Mass destruction, Michael barnett, Millennium ecosystem assessment, Multilateral, Multilateral institutions, Multilateral organization, National security, Next section, Nonstate actors, Nuclear weapons, Ongoing dialogue, Ontological frameworks, Other actors, Ozone layer, Participant, Paul edwards, Place limits, Policy choices, Policy leaders, Political authority, Political legitimacy, Political power, Polity press, Powerful actors, Powerful states, Princeton university press, Public deliberation, Public knowledge claims, Public policy, Raymond duvall, Recent years, Reputational accountability, Responsible exercise, Robert keohane, Same time, Science review, Security council, Sheila, Sheila jasanoff, Social knowledge, Social movements, Social order, Soft power, State behavior, Structure processes, Such standards, Sustainable development, Terrorist networks, Treaty organization, Treaty violations, Truth status, User forums, Weapons programs, Wide range, Wider array, World affairs, World bank, World commission, World politics, World trade organization, Worldwide cooperation.
- Teeft :
- Accountability, African elephant, Antiglobalization protests, Antonia handler chayes, Arbitrary exercise, Arctic, Arctic climate impact assessment, Arctic peoples, Arctic region, Available evidence, Biodiversity, Biodiversity conservation, Biological diversity, Broad participation, Bush administration, Cambridge university press, Central problem, Chayes, Civil society, Clark miller, Climate change, Climate science, Climate system, Common heritage, Conservation biologists, Credibility, Credibility contests, Critique, Deliberation, Deliberative, Deliberative democracy, Democratic constraints, Democratic critique, Democratic legitimacy, Democratic order, Democratic publics, Democratic reforms, Democratic societies, Domestic contexts, Domestic counterparts, Domestic politics, Domestic settings, Earthly politics, Ecosystem, Environmental governance, Epistemic, Epistemic chaos, Epistemic communities, Epistemic frameworks, Expert authority, Expert knowledge, Factual basis, Focal point, Framework convention, Full analysis, Global, Global affairs, Global biodiversity assessment, Global community, Global deliberation, Global environment, Global environment facility, Global exercise, Global governance, Global kinds, Global level, Global media, Global policies, Global policy, Global policy debates, Global politics, Global publics, Global society, Global systems, Global warming, Globalization, Governance, Greater detail, Greenhouse, Greenhouse gases, Harvard university press, Iaea, Iaea claims, Iaea inspections, Illegitimate exercise, Illicit weapons program, Independent sources, Indigenous communities, Indigenous groups, Indigenous peoples, Intelligence capabilities, International affairs, International assessments, International contexts, International governance, International institutions, International knowledge institutions, International order, International organization, International organizations, International relations, International settings, International system, International trade, Ipcc, Ipcc claims, Iraq, Iraqi, Iraqi possession, Jasanoff, Keohane, Knowledge claims, Knowledge institutions, Knowledge production, Kyoto protocol, Legitimacy, Legitimate exercise, Marginal groups, Martello, Martha finnemore, Marybeth, Mass destruction, Michael barnett, Millennium ecosystem assessment, Multilateral, Multilateral institutions, Multilateral organization, National security, Next section, Nonstate actors, Nuclear weapons, Ongoing dialogue, Ontological frameworks, Other actors, Ozone layer, Participant, Paul edwards, Place limits, Policy choices, Policy leaders, Political authority, Political legitimacy, Political power, Polity press, Powerful actors, Powerful states, Princeton university press, Public deliberation, Public knowledge claims, Public policy, Raymond duvall, Recent years, Reputational accountability, Responsible exercise, Robert keohane, Same time, Science review, Security council, Sheila, Sheila jasanoff, Social knowledge, Social movements, Social order, Soft power, State behavior, Structure processes, Such standards, Sustainable development, Terrorist networks, Treaty organization, Treaty violations, Truth status, User forums, Weapons programs, Wide range, Wider array, World affairs, World bank, World commission, World politics, World trade organization, Worldwide cooperation.
Abstract
The central problem of democracy has long been theorized as how to place appropriate constraints on the responsible exercise of power. Today, this problem is most acute in global governance. This article examines the rapid rise in the creation of international knowledge institutions, arguing that these institutions reflect a growing effort by nations and publics to assert democratic constraints on the on the global exercise of power through their ability to structure processes of reasoning and deliberation in global society. Specifically, the article argues for the need to attend carefully to processes of knowledge‐making in international institutions, including the roles of international institutions in setting standards for the exercise of reasoning, their contributions to the making of global kinds through their work in classifying and reclassifying the objects of international discourse, and through their roles in opening up and constraining participation in international deliberation. The article concludes that the construction and deployment of policy‐relevant knowledge are a significant source of power in their own right in global governance that need to be subject to their own democratic critique.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00359.x
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001551
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001551
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 002991
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 006B49
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 006A41
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions, and Global Governance</title>
<author><name sortKey="Miller, Clark A" sort="Miller, Clark A" uniqKey="Miller C" first="Clark A." last="Miller">Clark A. Miller</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:2C297993A73FE4DADD2A7AD9024E4C3B465C84C6</idno>
<date when="2007" year="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00359.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/2C297993A73FE4DADD2A7AD9024E4C3B465C84C6/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001551</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001551</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001551</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">002991</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002991</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0952-1895:2007:Miller C:democratization:international:knowledge</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">006B49</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">006A41</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">006A41</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions, and Global Governance</title>
<author><name sortKey="Miller, Clark A" sort="Miller, Clark A" uniqKey="Miller C" first="Clark A." last="Miller">Clark A. Miller</name>
<affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="no comma">University of Wisconsin‐Madison</wicri:noCountry>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Governance</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">GOVERNANCE</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0952-1895</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1468-0491</idno>
<imprint><biblScope unit="vol">20</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="325">325</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="357">357</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">33</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher>
<pubPlace>Malden, USA</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2007-04">2007-04</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0952-1895</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0952-1895</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Accountability</term>
<term>African elephant</term>
<term>Antiglobalization protests</term>
<term>Antonia handler chayes</term>
<term>Arbitrary exercise</term>
<term>Arctic</term>
<term>Arctic climate impact assessment</term>
<term>Arctic peoples</term>
<term>Arctic region</term>
<term>Available evidence</term>
<term>Biodiversity</term>
<term>Biodiversity conservation</term>
<term>Biological diversity</term>
<term>Broad participation</term>
<term>Bush administration</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Central problem</term>
<term>Chayes</term>
<term>Civil society</term>
<term>Clark miller</term>
<term>Climate change</term>
<term>Climate science</term>
<term>Climate system</term>
<term>Common heritage</term>
<term>Conservation biologists</term>
<term>Credibility</term>
<term>Credibility contests</term>
<term>Critique</term>
<term>Deliberation</term>
<term>Deliberative</term>
<term>Deliberative democracy</term>
<term>Democratic constraints</term>
<term>Democratic critique</term>
<term>Democratic legitimacy</term>
<term>Democratic order</term>
<term>Democratic publics</term>
<term>Democratic reforms</term>
<term>Democratic societies</term>
<term>Domestic contexts</term>
<term>Domestic counterparts</term>
<term>Domestic politics</term>
<term>Domestic settings</term>
<term>Earthly politics</term>
<term>Ecosystem</term>
<term>Environmental governance</term>
<term>Epistemic</term>
<term>Epistemic chaos</term>
<term>Epistemic communities</term>
<term>Epistemic frameworks</term>
<term>Expert authority</term>
<term>Expert knowledge</term>
<term>Factual basis</term>
<term>Focal point</term>
<term>Framework convention</term>
<term>Full analysis</term>
<term>Global</term>
<term>Global affairs</term>
<term>Global biodiversity assessment</term>
<term>Global community</term>
<term>Global deliberation</term>
<term>Global environment</term>
<term>Global environment facility</term>
<term>Global exercise</term>
<term>Global governance</term>
<term>Global kinds</term>
<term>Global level</term>
<term>Global media</term>
<term>Global policies</term>
<term>Global policy</term>
<term>Global policy debates</term>
<term>Global politics</term>
<term>Global publics</term>
<term>Global society</term>
<term>Global systems</term>
<term>Global warming</term>
<term>Globalization</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Greater detail</term>
<term>Greenhouse</term>
<term>Greenhouse gases</term>
<term>Harvard university press</term>
<term>Iaea</term>
<term>Iaea claims</term>
<term>Iaea inspections</term>
<term>Illegitimate exercise</term>
<term>Illicit weapons program</term>
<term>Independent sources</term>
<term>Indigenous communities</term>
<term>Indigenous groups</term>
<term>Indigenous peoples</term>
<term>Intelligence capabilities</term>
<term>International affairs</term>
<term>International assessments</term>
<term>International contexts</term>
<term>International governance</term>
<term>International institutions</term>
<term>International knowledge institutions</term>
<term>International order</term>
<term>International organization</term>
<term>International organizations</term>
<term>International relations</term>
<term>International settings</term>
<term>International system</term>
<term>International trade</term>
<term>Ipcc</term>
<term>Ipcc claims</term>
<term>Iraq</term>
<term>Iraqi</term>
<term>Iraqi possession</term>
<term>Jasanoff</term>
<term>Keohane</term>
<term>Knowledge claims</term>
<term>Knowledge institutions</term>
<term>Knowledge production</term>
<term>Kyoto protocol</term>
<term>Legitimacy</term>
<term>Legitimate exercise</term>
<term>Marginal groups</term>
<term>Martello</term>
<term>Martha finnemore</term>
<term>Marybeth</term>
<term>Mass destruction</term>
<term>Michael barnett</term>
<term>Millennium ecosystem assessment</term>
<term>Multilateral</term>
<term>Multilateral institutions</term>
<term>Multilateral organization</term>
<term>National security</term>
<term>Next section</term>
<term>Nonstate actors</term>
<term>Nuclear weapons</term>
<term>Ongoing dialogue</term>
<term>Ontological frameworks</term>
<term>Other actors</term>
<term>Ozone layer</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Paul edwards</term>
<term>Place limits</term>
<term>Policy choices</term>
<term>Policy leaders</term>
<term>Political authority</term>
<term>Political legitimacy</term>
<term>Political power</term>
<term>Polity press</term>
<term>Powerful actors</term>
<term>Powerful states</term>
<term>Princeton university press</term>
<term>Public deliberation</term>
<term>Public knowledge claims</term>
<term>Public policy</term>
<term>Raymond duvall</term>
<term>Recent years</term>
<term>Reputational accountability</term>
<term>Responsible exercise</term>
<term>Robert keohane</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Science review</term>
<term>Security council</term>
<term>Sheila</term>
<term>Sheila jasanoff</term>
<term>Social knowledge</term>
<term>Social movements</term>
<term>Social order</term>
<term>Soft power</term>
<term>State behavior</term>
<term>Structure processes</term>
<term>Such standards</term>
<term>Sustainable development</term>
<term>Terrorist networks</term>
<term>Treaty organization</term>
<term>Treaty violations</term>
<term>Truth status</term>
<term>User forums</term>
<term>Weapons programs</term>
<term>Wide range</term>
<term>Wider array</term>
<term>World affairs</term>
<term>World bank</term>
<term>World commission</term>
<term>World politics</term>
<term>World trade organization</term>
<term>Worldwide cooperation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Accountability</term>
<term>African elephant</term>
<term>Antiglobalization protests</term>
<term>Antonia handler chayes</term>
<term>Arbitrary exercise</term>
<term>Arctic</term>
<term>Arctic climate impact assessment</term>
<term>Arctic peoples</term>
<term>Arctic region</term>
<term>Available evidence</term>
<term>Biodiversity</term>
<term>Biodiversity conservation</term>
<term>Biological diversity</term>
<term>Broad participation</term>
<term>Bush administration</term>
<term>Cambridge university press</term>
<term>Central problem</term>
<term>Chayes</term>
<term>Civil society</term>
<term>Clark miller</term>
<term>Climate change</term>
<term>Climate science</term>
<term>Climate system</term>
<term>Common heritage</term>
<term>Conservation biologists</term>
<term>Credibility</term>
<term>Credibility contests</term>
<term>Critique</term>
<term>Deliberation</term>
<term>Deliberative</term>
<term>Deliberative democracy</term>
<term>Democratic constraints</term>
<term>Democratic critique</term>
<term>Democratic legitimacy</term>
<term>Democratic order</term>
<term>Democratic publics</term>
<term>Democratic reforms</term>
<term>Democratic societies</term>
<term>Domestic contexts</term>
<term>Domestic counterparts</term>
<term>Domestic politics</term>
<term>Domestic settings</term>
<term>Earthly politics</term>
<term>Ecosystem</term>
<term>Environmental governance</term>
<term>Epistemic</term>
<term>Epistemic chaos</term>
<term>Epistemic communities</term>
<term>Epistemic frameworks</term>
<term>Expert authority</term>
<term>Expert knowledge</term>
<term>Factual basis</term>
<term>Focal point</term>
<term>Framework convention</term>
<term>Full analysis</term>
<term>Global</term>
<term>Global affairs</term>
<term>Global biodiversity assessment</term>
<term>Global community</term>
<term>Global deliberation</term>
<term>Global environment</term>
<term>Global environment facility</term>
<term>Global exercise</term>
<term>Global governance</term>
<term>Global kinds</term>
<term>Global level</term>
<term>Global media</term>
<term>Global policies</term>
<term>Global policy</term>
<term>Global policy debates</term>
<term>Global politics</term>
<term>Global publics</term>
<term>Global society</term>
<term>Global systems</term>
<term>Global warming</term>
<term>Globalization</term>
<term>Governance</term>
<term>Greater detail</term>
<term>Greenhouse</term>
<term>Greenhouse gases</term>
<term>Harvard university press</term>
<term>Iaea</term>
<term>Iaea claims</term>
<term>Iaea inspections</term>
<term>Illegitimate exercise</term>
<term>Illicit weapons program</term>
<term>Independent sources</term>
<term>Indigenous communities</term>
<term>Indigenous groups</term>
<term>Indigenous peoples</term>
<term>Intelligence capabilities</term>
<term>International affairs</term>
<term>International assessments</term>
<term>International contexts</term>
<term>International governance</term>
<term>International institutions</term>
<term>International knowledge institutions</term>
<term>International order</term>
<term>International organization</term>
<term>International organizations</term>
<term>International relations</term>
<term>International settings</term>
<term>International system</term>
<term>International trade</term>
<term>Ipcc</term>
<term>Ipcc claims</term>
<term>Iraq</term>
<term>Iraqi</term>
<term>Iraqi possession</term>
<term>Jasanoff</term>
<term>Keohane</term>
<term>Knowledge claims</term>
<term>Knowledge institutions</term>
<term>Knowledge production</term>
<term>Kyoto protocol</term>
<term>Legitimacy</term>
<term>Legitimate exercise</term>
<term>Marginal groups</term>
<term>Martello</term>
<term>Martha finnemore</term>
<term>Marybeth</term>
<term>Mass destruction</term>
<term>Michael barnett</term>
<term>Millennium ecosystem assessment</term>
<term>Multilateral</term>
<term>Multilateral institutions</term>
<term>Multilateral organization</term>
<term>National security</term>
<term>Next section</term>
<term>Nonstate actors</term>
<term>Nuclear weapons</term>
<term>Ongoing dialogue</term>
<term>Ontological frameworks</term>
<term>Other actors</term>
<term>Ozone layer</term>
<term>Participant</term>
<term>Paul edwards</term>
<term>Place limits</term>
<term>Policy choices</term>
<term>Policy leaders</term>
<term>Political authority</term>
<term>Political legitimacy</term>
<term>Political power</term>
<term>Polity press</term>
<term>Powerful actors</term>
<term>Powerful states</term>
<term>Princeton university press</term>
<term>Public deliberation</term>
<term>Public knowledge claims</term>
<term>Public policy</term>
<term>Raymond duvall</term>
<term>Recent years</term>
<term>Reputational accountability</term>
<term>Responsible exercise</term>
<term>Robert keohane</term>
<term>Same time</term>
<term>Science review</term>
<term>Security council</term>
<term>Sheila</term>
<term>Sheila jasanoff</term>
<term>Social knowledge</term>
<term>Social movements</term>
<term>Social order</term>
<term>Soft power</term>
<term>State behavior</term>
<term>Structure processes</term>
<term>Such standards</term>
<term>Sustainable development</term>
<term>Terrorist networks</term>
<term>Treaty organization</term>
<term>Treaty violations</term>
<term>Truth status</term>
<term>User forums</term>
<term>Weapons programs</term>
<term>Wide range</term>
<term>Wider array</term>
<term>World affairs</term>
<term>World bank</term>
<term>World commission</term>
<term>World politics</term>
<term>World trade organization</term>
<term>Worldwide cooperation</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Iraq</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Arctique</term>
<term>Biodiversité</term>
<term>Société civile</term>
<term>Changement climatique</term>
<term>Démocratie délibérative</term>
<term>écosystème</term>
<term>Réchauffement climatique</term>
<term>Gouvernance</term>
<term>Politique internationale</term>
<term>Relation internationale</term>
<term>Commerce international</term>
<term>Légitimité</term>
<term>Pouvoir politique</term>
<term>Politique publique</term>
<term>Développement durable</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The central problem of democracy has long been theorized as how to place appropriate constraints on the responsible exercise of power. Today, this problem is most acute in global governance. This article examines the rapid rise in the creation of international knowledge institutions, arguing that these institutions reflect a growing effort by nations and publics to assert democratic constraints on the on the global exercise of power through their ability to structure processes of reasoning and deliberation in global society. Specifically, the article argues for the need to attend carefully to processes of knowledge‐making in international institutions, including the roles of international institutions in setting standards for the exercise of reasoning, their contributions to the making of global kinds through their work in classifying and reclassifying the objects of international discourse, and through their roles in opening up and constraining participation in international deliberation. The article concludes that the construction and deployment of policy‐relevant knowledge are a significant source of power in their own right in global governance that need to be subject to their own democratic critique.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations><list></list>
<tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Miller, Clark A" sort="Miller, Clark A" uniqKey="Miller C" first="Clark A." last="Miller">Clark A. Miller</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 006A41 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 006A41 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Wicri/Santé |area= EdenteV2 |flux= Main |étape= Exploration |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:2C297993A73FE4DADD2A7AD9024E4C3B465C84C6 |texte= Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions, and Global Governance }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |